As described in the report the democracy index is a weighted average based on the answers of 60 questions, each one with either two or three permitted alternative answers. Most answers are experts’ assessments. Some answers are provided by public-opinion surveys from the respective countries. In the case of countries for which survey results are missing, survey results for similar countries, and expert assessments are used in order to fill in gaps.
The questions are grouped into five categories: electoral process and pluralism, civil liberties, the functioning of government, political participation, and political culture. Each answer is converted to a score, either 0 or 1, or for the three-answer questions, 0, 0.5 or 1. With the exceptions mentioned below, within each category, the scores are added, multiplied by ten, and divided by the total number of questions within the category. There are a few modifying dependencies, which are explained much more precisely than the main rule procedures. In a few cases, an answer yielding zero for one question voids another question; e.g. if the elections for the national legislature and head of government are not considered free (question 1), then the next question, “Are elections… fair?“, is not considered, but automatically scored zero. Likewise, there are a few questions considered so important that a low score on them yields a penalty on the total score sum for their respective categories, namely:
- “Whether national elections are free and fair”;
- “The security of voters”;
- “The influence of foreign powers on government”;
- “The capability of the civil servants to implement policies”.
The five category indices, which are listed in the report, are then averaged to find the Democracy Index for a given country. Finally, the Democracy Index, rounded to two decimals, decides the regime type classification of the country.
The report discusses other indices of democracy, as defined, e.g. by Freedom House, and argues for some of the choices made by the team from the Economist Intelligence Unit. In this comparison, a higher emphasis is placed on the public opinion and attitudes, as measured by surveys, but on the other hand, economic living standards are not weighted as one criterion of democracy (as seemingly some other investigators have done).
The report is widely cited in the international press as well as in peer reviewed academic journals.
Classification definitions
Full democracies are nations where civil liberties and fundamental political freedoms are not only respected but also reinforced by a political culture conducive to the thriving of democratic principles. These nations have a valid system of governmental checks and balances, an independent judiciary whose decisions are enforced, governments that function adequately, and diverse and independent media. These nations have only limited problems in democratic functioning.
Flawed democracies are nations where elections are fair and free and basic civil liberties are honoured but may have issues (e.g. media freedom infringement and minor suppression of political opposition and critics). These nations have significant faults in other democratic aspects, including underdeveloped political culture, low levels of participation in politics, and issues in the functioning of governance.
Hybrid regimes are nations with regular electoral frauds, preventing them from being fair and free democracies. These nations commonly have governments that apply pressure on political opposition, non-independent judiciaries, widespread corruption, harassment and pressure placed on the media, anaemic rule of law, and more pronounced faults than flawed democracies in the realms of underdeveloped political culture, low levels of participation in politics, and issues in the functioning of governance.
Authoritarian regimes are nations where political pluralism is nonexistent or severely limited. These nations are often absolute monarchies or dictatorships, may have some conventional institutions of democracy but with meagre significance, infringements and abuses of civil liberties are commonplace, elections (if they take place) are not fair and free, the media is often state-owned or controlled by groups associated with the ruling regime, the judiciary is not independent, and censorship and suppression of governmental criticism are commonplace.
Democracy Index by country 2019
Listing by country is available on The Economist website.
Rank | Country | Score | Electoral process and pluralism |
Functioning of government |
Political participation |
Political culture |
Civil liberties |
Regime type |
Region[n 1] | Changes from last year |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() |
9.87 | 10.00 | 9.64 | 10.00 | 10.00 | 9.71 | Full democracy | Western Europe | Score: ![]() Rank: ![]() |
2 | ![]() |
9.58 | 10.00 | 9.29 | 8.89 | 10.00 | 9.71 | Full democracy | Western Europe | |
3 | ![]() |
9.39 | 9.58 | 9.64 | 8.33 | 10.00 | 9.41 | Full democracy | Western Europe | |
4 | ![]() |
9.26 | 10.00 | 9.29 | 8.89 | 8.13 | 10.00 | Full democracy | Asia & Australasia | |
5 | ![]() |
9.25 | 10.00 | 8.93 | 8.89 | 8.75 | 9.71 | Full democracy | Western Europe | Score: ![]() Rank: ![]() |
6 | ![]() |
9.24 | 10.00 | 7.86 | 8.33 | 10.00 | 10.00 | Full democracy | Western Europe | Score: ![]() Rank: ![]() |
7 | ![]() |
9.22 | 10.00 | 9.29 | 8.33 | 9.38 | 9.12 | Full democracy | Western Europe | Score: ![]() Rank: ![]() |
![]() |
9.22 | 9.58 | 9.64 | 7.78 | 9.38 | 9.71 | Full democracy | North America | Score: ![]() Rank: ![]() |
|
9 | ![]() |
9.09 | 10.00 | 8.93 | 7.78 | 8.75 | 10.00 | Full democracy | Asia & Australasia | Score: ![]() Rank: ![]() |
10 | ![]() |
9.03 | 9.58 | 9.29 | 7.78 | 9.38 | 9.12 | Full democracy | Western Europe | |
11 | ![]() |
9.01 | 9.58 | 9.29 | 8.33 | 8.75 | 9.12 | Full democracy | Western Europe | Score: ![]() Rank: ![]() |
12 | ![]() |
8.81 | 10.00 | 8.93 | 6.67 | 8.75 | 9.71 | Full democracy | Western Europe | Score: ![]() Rank: ![]() |
13 | ![]() |
8.68 | 9.58 | 8.57 | 8.33 | 7.50 | 9.41 | Full democracy | Western Europe | |
14 | ![]() |
8.52 | 9.58 | 7.50 | 8.89 | 7.50 | 9.12 | Full democracy | Western Europe | Score: ![]() Rank: ![]() |
15 | ![]() |
8.38 | 10.00 | 8.57 | 6.11 | 7.50 | 9.71 | Full democracy | Latin America | Score: ![]() Rank: ![]() |
16 | ![]() |
8.29 | 9.58 | 7.86 | 8.33 | 6.88 | 8.82 | Full democracy | Western Europe | Score: ![]() Rank: ![]() |
![]() |
8.29 | 9.58 | 7.14 | 7.78 | 8.13 | 8.82 | Full democracy | Western Europe | Score: ![]() Rank: ![]() |
|
18 | ![]() |
8.22 | 9.17 | 8.21 | 5.56 | 8.75 | 9.41 | Full democracy | Sub-Saharan Africa | Score: ![]() Rank: ![]() |
19 | ![]() |
8.13 | 9.58 | 7.50 | 6.67 | 7.50 | 9.41 | Full democracy | Latin America | Score: ![]() Rank: ![]() |
20 | ![]() |
8.12 | 9.58 | 7.86 | 7.78 | 6.88 | 8.53 | Full democracy | Western Europe | Score: ![]() Rank: ![]() |
21 | ![]() |
8.08 | 9.58 | 8.57 | 5.00 | 8.13 | 9.12 | Full democracy | Latin America | Score: ![]() Rank: ![]() |
22 | ![]() |
8.03 | 9.58 | 7.86 | 6.11 | 7.50 | 9.12 | Full democracy | Western Europe | Score: ![]() Rank: ![]() |
23 | ![]() |
8.00 | 9.17 | 7.86 | 7.22 | 7.50 | 8.24 | Flawed democracy | Asia & Australasia | Score: ![]() Rank: ![]() |
24 | ![]() |
7.99 | 8.75 | 8.21 | 6.67 | 7.50 | 8.82 | Flawed democracy | Asia & Australasia | |
25 | ![]() |
7.96 | 9.17 | 7.14 | 7.78 | 7.50 | 8.24 | Flawed democracy | North America | Score: ![]() Rank: ![]() |
26 | ![]() |
7.95 | 9.17 | 7.50 | 6.11 | 8.13 | 8.82 | Flawed democracy | Western Europe | Score: ![]() Rank: ![]() |
27 | ![]() |
7.90 | 9.58 | 7.86 | 6.67 | 6.88 | 8.53 | Flawed democracy | Eastern Europe | Score: ![]() Rank: ![]() |
28 | ![]() |
7.86 | 9.17 | 7.86 | 8.89 | 7.50 | 5.88 | Flawed democracy | Middle East & North Africa | Score: ![]() Rank: ![]() |
29 | ![]() |
7.81 | 9.17 | 7.14 | 6.11 | 7.50 | 9.12 | Flawed democracy | Sub-Saharan Africa | Score: ![]() Rank: ![]() |
30 | ![]() |
7.78 | 9.17 | 7.36 | 6.67 | 6.88 | 8.82 | Flawed democracy | Sub-Saharan Africa | Score: ![]() Rank: ![]() |
31 | ![]() |
7.73 | 9.58 | 8.21 | 6.11 | 5.63 | 9.12 | Flawed democracy | Asia & Australasia | Score: ![]() Rank: ![]() |
32 | ![]() |
7.69 | 9.58 | 6.79 | 6.67 | 6.88 | 8.53 | Flawed democracy | Eastern Europe | Score: ![]() Rank: ![]() |
33 | ![]() |
7.64 | 9.58 | 8.21 | 5.00 | 6.88 | 8.53 | Flawed democracy | Western Europe | Score: ![]() Rank: ![]() |
34 | ![]() |
7.59 | 9.17 | 6.43 | 6.67 | 6.88 | 8.82 | Flawed democracy | Western Europe | Score: ![]() Rank: ![]() |
35 | ![]() |
7.52 | 9.58 | 6.07 | 7.78 | 6.25 | 7.94 | Flawed democracy | Western Europe | Score: ![]() Rank: ![]() |
36 | ![]() |
7.50 | 9.58 | 6.79 | 6.67 | 6.25 | 8.24 | Flawed democracy | Eastern Europe | Score: ![]() Rank: ![]() |
![]() |
7.50 | 9.58 | 6.43 | 6.11 | 6.25 | 9.12 | Flawed democracy | Eastern Europe | ||
38 | ![]() |
7.49 | 9.58 | 6.07 | 6.11 | 6.88 | 8.82 | Flawed democracy | Eastern Europe | Score: ![]() Rank: ![]() |
39 | ![]() |
7.43 | 9.58 | 4.86 | 6.67 | 7.50 | 8.53 | Flawed democracy | Western Europe | Score: ![]() Rank: ![]() |
40 | ![]() |
7.24 | 7.42 | 7.50 | 8.33 | 5.00 | 7.94 | Flawed democracy | Sub-Saharan Africa | Score: ![]() Rank: ![]() |
41 | ![]() |
7.19 | 9.58 | 6.29 | 5.56 | 6.88 | 7.65 | Flawed democracy | Asia & Australasia | Score: ![]() Rank: ![]() |
42 | ![]() |
7.17 | 9.58 | 7.14 | 5.56 | 5.63 | 7.94 | Flawed democracy | Eastern Europe | Score: ![]() Rank: ![]() |
43 | ![]() |
7.16 | 9.17 | 7.86 | 6.67 | 6.25 | 5.88 | Flawed democracy | Asia & Australasia | Score: ![]() Rank: ![]() |
![]() |
7.16 | 9.58 | 7.14 | 6.11 | 5.63 | 7.35 | Flawed democracy | Latin America | Score: ![]() Rank: ![]() |
|
45 | ![]() |
7.13 | 9.17 | 6.79 | 5.56 | 5.63 | 8.53 | Flawed democracy | Latin America | Score: ![]() Rank: ![]() |
46 | ![]() |
7.05 | 9.58 | 6.07 | 6.67 | 5.00 | 7.94 | Flawed democracy | Latin America | Score: ![]() Rank: ![]() |
47 | ![]() |
7.03 | 9.17 | 6.43 | 7.22 | 4.38 | 7.94 | Flawed democracy | Eastern Europe | |
48 | ![]() |
7.02 | 9.17 | 5.36 | 6.11 | 6.25 | 8.24 | Flawed democracy | Latin America | |
49 | ![]() |
6.98 | 9.17 | 6.43 | 6.67 | 5.00 | 7.65 | Flawed democracy | Latin America | Score: ![]() Rank: ![]() |
50 | ![]() |
6.96 | 8.75 | 7.14 | 4.44 | 6.25 | 8.24 | Flawed democracy | Latin America | Score: ![]() Rank: ![]() |
51 | ![]() |
6.90 | 8.67 | 6.79 | 6.67 | 5.63 | 6.76 | Flawed democracy | Asia & Australasia | Score: ![]() Rank: ![]() |
52 | ![]() |
6.86 | 9.58 | 5.36 | 6.11 | 5.00 | 8.24 | Flawed democracy | Latin America | Score: ![]() Rank: ![]() |
53 | ![]() |
6.72 | 9.17 | 5.71 | 7.22 | 5.63 | 5.88 | Flawed democracy | Middle East & North Africa | Score: ![]() Rank: ![]() |
54 | ![]() |
6.64 | 9.17 | 5.36 | 7.22 | 4.38 | 7.06 | Flawed democracy | Asia & Australasia | Score: ![]() Rank: ![]() |
55 | ![]() |
6.63 | 8.33 | 5.71 | 6.67 | 6.25 | 6.18 | Flawed democracy | Sub-Saharan Africa | Score: ![]() Rank: ![]() |
![]() |
6.63 | 8.75 | 6.07 | 5.00 | 6.25 | 7.06 | Flawed democracy | Eastern Europe | ||
57 | ![]() |
6.62 | 9.17 | 6.07 | 6.11 | 4.38 | 7.35 | Flawed democracy | Eastern Europe | Score: ![]() Rank: ![]() |
58 | ![]() |
6.60 | 9.17 | 5.00 | 5.56 | 5.63 | 7.65 | Flawed democracy | Latin America | Score: ![]() Rank: ![]() |
59 | ![]() |
6.57 | 9.17 | 6.07 | 5.56 | 5.00 | 7.06 | Flawed democracy | Eastern Europe | Score: ![]() Rank: ![]() |
60 | ![]() |
6.54 | 9.17 | 5.36 | 6.11 | 5.00 | 7.06 | Flawed democracy | Latin America | Score: ![]() Rank: ![]() |
![]() |
6.54 | 9.17 | 4.50 | 6.67 | 5.63 | 6.76 | Flawed democracy | Sub-Saharan Africa | Score: ![]() Rank: ![]() |
|
62 | ![]() |
6.50 | 9.17 | 5.71 | 5.56 | 5.00 | 7.06 | Flawed democracy | Asia & Australasia | Score: ![]() Rank: ![]() |
63 | ![]() |
6.49 | 9.17 | 5.71 | 5.56 | 4.38 | 7.65 | Flawed democracy | Eastern Europe | Score: ![]() Rank: ![]() |
64 | ![]() |
6.48 | 7.92 | 7.14 | 6.11 | 5.63 | 5.59 | Flawed democracy | Asia & Australasia | Score: ![]() Rank: ![]() |
65 | ![]() |
6.43 | 6.58 | 5.36 | 6.67 | 5.63 | 7.94 | Flawed democracy | Sub-Saharan Africa | Score: ![]() Rank: ![]() |
66 | ![]() |
6.41 | 8.25 | 5.36 | 6.11 | 5.00 | 7.35 | Flawed democracy | Eastern Europe | Score: ![]() Rank: ![]() |
67 | ![]() |
6.33 | 8.75 | 5.36 | 6.11 | 4.38 | 7.06 | Flawed democracy | Latin America | Score: ![]() Rank: ![]() |
68 | ![]() |
6.32 | 7.42 | 5.36 | 6.11 | 6.25 | 6.47 | Flawed democracy | Asia & Australasia | Score: ![]() Rank: ![]() |
69 | ![]() |
6.27 | 7.00 | 6.07 | 5.56 | 6.25 | 6.47 | Flawed democracy | Asia & Australasia | Score: ![]() Rank: ![]() |
70 | ![]() |
6.24 | 8.75 | 5.71 | 5.00 | 4.38 | 7.35 | Flawed democracy | Latin America | Score: ![]() Rank: ![]() |
71 | ![]() |
6.15 | 9.17 | 4.64 | 6.11 | 3.75 | 7.06 | Flawed democracy | Latin America | Score: ![]() Rank: ![]() |
![]() |
6.15 | 6.92 | 5.36 | 6.11 | 5.00 | 7.35 | Flawed democracy | Latin America | Score: ![]() Rank: ![]() |
|
73 | ![]() |
6.09 | 7.83 | 6.07 | 7.22 | 3.13 | 6.18 | Flawed democracy | Latin America | Score: ![]() Rank: ![]() |
74 | ![]() |
6.03 | 6.92 | 6.07 | 3.89 | 5.63 | 7.65 | Flawed democracy | Asia & Australasia | Score: ![]() Rank: ![]() |
75 | ![]() |
6.02 | 3.58 | 4.36 | 6.11 | 7.50 | 8.53 | Flawed democracy | Asia & Australasia | Score: ![]() Rank: ![]() |
![]() |
6.02 | 3.92 | 7.86 | 5.00 | 6.25 | 7.06 | Flawed democracy | Asia & Australasia | Score: ![]() Rank: ![]() |
|
77 | ![]() |
5.97 | 7.00 | 5.36 | 6.67 | 3.75 | 7.06 | Hybrid regime | Eastern Europe | Score: ![]() Rank: ![]() |
78 | ![]() |
5.90 | 7.42 | 2.71 | 6.67 | 6.25 | 6.47 | Hybrid regime | Eastern Europe | Score: ![]() Rank: ![]() |
79 | ![]() |
5.89 | 7.00 | 5.36 | 4.44 | 5.00 | 7.65 | Hybrid regime | Eastern Europe | Score: ![]() Rank: ![]() |
80 | ![]() |
5.88 | 7.83 | 6.07 | 6.11 | 4.38 | 5.00 | Hybrid regime | Asia & Australasia | Score: ![]() Rank: ![]() |
81 | ![]() |
5.85 | 6.58 | 5.36 | 6.11 | 5.63 | 5.59 | Hybrid regime | Asia & Australasia | Score: ![]() Rank: ![]() |
82 | ![]() |
5.81 | 6.08 | 6.07 | 4.44 | 6.25 | 6.18 | Hybrid regime | Sub-Saharan Africa | Score: ![]() Rank: ![]() |
83 | ![]() |
5.75 | 6.58 | 4.64 | 6.11 | 4.38 | 7.06 | Hybrid regime | Eastern Europe | Score: ![]() Rank: ![]() |
84 | ![]() |
5.65 | 5.67 | 5.36 | 6.11 | 4.38 | 6.76 | Hybrid regime | Eastern Europe | Score: ![]() Rank: ![]() |
85 | ![]() |
5.64 | 7.92 | 3.57 | 6.11 | 5.63 | 5.00 | Hybrid regime | Sub-Saharan Africa | Score: ![]() Rank: ![]() |
86 | ![]() |
5.54 | 7.50 | 5.36 | 6.11 | 3.13 | 5.59 | Hybrid regime | Eastern Europe | Score: ![]() Rank: ![]() |
87 | ![]() |
5.50 | 6.08 | 4.29 | 5.00 | 6.25 | 5.88 | Hybrid regime | Sub-Saharan Africa | Score: ![]() Rank: ![]() |
88 | ![]() |
5.45 | 7.42 | 3.07 | 5.56 | 5.63 | 5.59 | Hybrid regime | Sub-Saharan Africa | Score: ![]() Rank: ![]() |
89 | ![]() |
5.42 | 7.83 | 3.21 | 6.11 | 4.38 | 5.59 | Hybrid regime | Eastern Europe | Score: ![]() Rank: ![]() |
Honduras | 5.42 | 7.83 | 4.29 | 4.44 | 4.38 | 6.18 | Hybrid regime | Latin America | Score: ![]() Rank: ![]() |
|
91 | ![]() |
5.30 | 8.75 | 6.79 | 2.78 | 4.38 | 3.82 | Hybrid regime | Asia & Australasia | Score: ![]() Rank: ![]() |
92 | ![]() |
5.28 | 4.83 | 5.36 | 5.00 | 5.63 | 5.59 | Hybrid regime | Asia & Australasia | Score: ![]() Rank: ![]() |
93 | ![]() |
5.26 | 6.92 | 4.64 | 3.89 | 4.38 | 6.47 | Hybrid regime | Latin America | Score: ![]() Rank: ![]() |
94 | ![]() |
5.18 | 3.50 | 5.71 | 6.67 | 5.63 | 4.41 | Hybrid regime | Sub-Saharan Africa | Score: ![]() Rank: ![]() |
95 | ![]() |
5.16 | 5.75 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.63 | 4.41 | Hybrid regime | Sub-Saharan Africa | Score: ![]() Rank: ![]() |
96 | ![]() |
5.10 | 5.25 | 4.64 | 5.56 | 5.63 | 4.41 | Hybrid regime | Middle East & North Africa | Score: ![]() Rank: ![]() |
97 | ![]() |
5.09 | 4.67 | 5.71 | 4.44 | 5.63 | 5.00 | Hybrid regime | Sub-Saharan Africa | Score: ![]() Rank: ![]() |
![]() |
5.09 | 4.75 | 2.93 | 4.44 | 6.88 | 6.47 | Hybrid regime | Sub-Saharan Africa | Score: ![]() Rank: ![]() |
|
99 | ![]() |
5.02 | 4.33 | 3.57 | 4.44 | 6.88 | 5.88 | Hybrid regime | Sub-Saharan Africa | Score: ![]() Rank: ![]() |
100 | ![]() |
4.92 | 6.42 | 3.07 | 3.89 | 5.63 | 5.59 | Hybrid regime | Sub-Saharan Africa | Score: ![]() Rank: ![]() |
101 | ![]() |
4.89 | 6.08 | 2.93 | 6.67 | 3.75 | 5.00 | Hybrid regime | Eastern Europe | Score: ![]() Rank: ![]() |
102 | ![]() |
4.86 | 6.17 | 2.93 | 5.56 | 3.75 | 5.88 | Hybrid regime | Eastern Europe | Score: ![]() Rank: ![]() |
![]() |
4.86 | 6.58 | 2.86 | 3.33 | 6.25 | 5.29 | Hybrid regime | Sub-Saharan Africa | Score: ![]() Rank: ![]() |
|
104 | ![]() |
4.84 | 4.75 | 3.93 | 5.00 | 3.75 | 6.76 | Hybrid regime | Latin America | Score: ![]() Rank: ![]() |
105 | ![]() |
4.57 | 4.75 | 2.07 | 3.89 | 6.25 | 5.88 | Hybrid regime | Latin America | Score: ![]() Rank: ![]() |
106 | ![]() |
4.36 | 3.92 | 1.50 | 6.67 | 5.00 | 4.71 | Hybrid regime | Middle East & North Africa | Score: ![]() Rank: ![]() |
107 | ![]() |
4.33 | 4.00 | 4.29 | 3.33 | 5.63 | 4.41 | Hybrid regime | Sub-Saharan Africa | Score: ![]() Rank: ![]() |
108 | ![]() |
4.25 | 6.08 | 5.71 | 2.22 | 2.50 | 4.71 | Hybrid regime | Asia & Australasia | Score: ![]() Rank: ![]() |
109 | ![]() |
4.12 | 5.17 | 3.93 | 3.33 | 3.75 | 4.41 | Hybrid regime | Sub-Saharan Africa | Score: ![]() |